« New Mexico State Auditor Hector Balderas Announces Run for Second Term | Main |

Monday, August 03, 2009

Victory: U.S. District Court Grants NM Youth Organized and SWOP Summary Judgment in Nonprofit Suit

Note: Also see our which includes a statement about the decision issued by the Center for Civic Policy.

Today, the Honorable Judith C. Herrera of the U.S. Region Court for the District of New Mexico issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order that gifts rundown judgment to the offended parties New Mexico Youth Organized (as venture of the Center for Civic Policy) and Southwest Organizing Project in their suit against Secretary of State Mary Herrera.

The claim was a reaction to Herrera sending a letter to the charities debilitating to arraign or generally authorize them for their inability to enlist and report as political boards. The offended parties looked for a revelatory judgment expressing that specific arrangements of New Mexico's Campaign revealing Act are unlawful, either facially or as connected to them, and asserted Herrera's undermined activity compliant with the Act disregarded their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Snap to peruse the whole 30-page administering.

The Secretary of State had purportedly based her request that the philanthropies record as PACs on the odd - without a doubt - conclusion of Attorney General Gary King. Lord said he thought the charities had been acting politically when they conveyed instructive post office based mail pieces months before a pending race to the locale of a modest bunch of administrators. The pieces managed the administrators' votes on specific bills, and how the votes corresponded with the interests of some of their expansive crusade contributors. The main clear reason AG King refered to clarify his view was that if something strolls like a duck and acts like a duck, it's a duck. I figure he wasn't right - at any rate as per the judgment of the U.S. Area Court.

Quack, quack!

In the wake of surveying the movements, briefs, connections, and sworn statements, and being generally completely educated, the Court finds that Defendant has not met its weight to show the lawfulness of the tested statute, and along these lines finds that Plaintiffs' movement for outline judgment is well taken and will be allowed. Since the allow of outline judgment agrees Plaintiffs the greater part of the help that they look for, their movement for preparatory order is denied as unsettled.

The first grumblings to AG King about the mailings originated from previous State Senator Shannon Robinson, who wound up being crushed in the 2008 Democratic Primary race at this point Sen. Tim Keller, and Dem Sen. Bernadette Sanchez, who was reelected to her seat in 2008.

For more background on this matter, see these previous DFNM blog posts:

August 3, 2009 at 12:30 PM in Civil Liberties, Corporatism, Ethics & Campaign Reform, Government, Justice, Legal Issues, Progressivism | Permalink

Comments

Quack, quack is right! The attacks on the nonprofits fueled by Gary King and carried out by Mary Herrera were silly on their face. I think this case shows that King and Herrera are NOT on the side of ethics and campaign reform and hit at those who are.

King and Herrera are old machine politicians. They need to stop trying to kill the strong movement for transparency and truth in government.

Posted by: Esq. | Aug 3, 2009 1:06:18 PM

Congratz to you guys. I've crossed swords enough with some of y'all on this issue and after everything I stirred up on here I felt I should come in and say "y'all were right and my take was wrong," as was borne out today.

B (on my lunch break)

Posted by: Benson | Aug 3, 2009 1:21:06 PM

Thanks, Benson. It shows you are a classy individual to come back here and say what you did. I appreciate it and there are no hard feelings.

Posted by: barb | Aug 3, 2009 1:30:04 PM

Thanks Barb, I dunno about "classy," some of the others might beg to differ. ;) Passionate yeah, even if I'm on the wrong side. Again, I apologize for being a jerk.

B

Posted by: Benson | Aug 3, 2009 1:48:23 PM

The truth comes out at last! We all knew King and Herrera had no case. That's why they never gave any reasons that pass legal muster for putting the pressure on the non-profits. They were made the money guys lost and the clean government candidates won and they took action without any principles. Shame on Mary Herrera but more on AG Gary King. You've been found out Gary. You used to be one of the good guys but now you are in the mud.

Posted by: Old Dem | Aug 3, 2009 2:11:55 PM

Bigger jerks: Mary and Gary.

Posted by: bg | Aug 3, 2009 2:13:05 PM

Can we get a real Democrat to run against Gary King in the Democratic primary for AG? Please

Posted by: SCC | Aug 3, 2009 2:33:22 PM

I see Monahan is whining. All his predictions were dead wrong. Hey Joe: Nobody cares if you think the materials sent out were "electioneering." You're not a lawyer. You're not neutral. You hang with the sharks who got beaten because they are lazy crooks.

Posted by: Hey Joe | Aug 4, 2009 10:50:33 AM