« A Message to Our Grandchildren: Stewart and Lee Udall | Main | Newsflash: Large Amounts of Money Being Raised by Candidates »
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Guest Blog: Mikhail Gorbachev in Santa Fe
This is a guest blog by Stephen Fox, alternative newspaper managing editor and gallery owner of Santa Fe, who participated in yesterday's press conference in Santa Fe featuring the former President of the USSR, Mikhail Gorbachev. President Gorbachev also appeared at a fundraising dinner to benefit the Santa Fe Institute and Global Green USA, and spoke to a standing room only crowd at the Lensic Performing Arts Center.
On Monday I asked former USSR President Mikhail Gorbachev if, after November, he would please be so kind as to lead and advise the next USA President as to how to get out of our quagmire. This is Gorbachev's reply, through a translator:
“The Middle East is what the entire world is watching. If things go badly for the USA, things go badly for all of us. America must not abuse the trust it has from its allies, much of which has virtually stopped. I am glad to see in this election a resurgence of interest in international affairs. As I will say in my talk tonight, judging from the USA’s military budget, your nation seems to be at war with the world, and I sense that the American people don’t like this at all. The size of your weapons budget is larger than it was at the peak of the Cold War, and larger all of the rest of the nuclear nations put together. Why do you continue to build these weapons? This is amazing to me!
I think that [former Secretaries of State] George Schultz and Henry Kissinger, [former US Senator] Sam Nunn, and [former Secretary of Defense] William Perry have put together recently a very interesting plan in this regard, for which I appreciate their initiative.
With a background of conflict, military budgets in the USA continue to grow, and you produce more weapons. The next president must show courage and responsibility to resist increasing your arms expenditures. Most serious nations in the European Union are studying the proposal by Schultz and Kissinger, and the USA should heed this proposal.
You must bear in mind, that many nations find it difficult to trust America if it insists on maintaining its weapon superiority.
After January 1, 1986, when I proposed an abolition of Nuclear Weapons, there was an immediate reaction, that many didn’t trust me, because of the USSR’s massive ground forces and conventional weapons. I replied by making some large cuts in spending for conventional weapons, and eventually we signed a treaty in this context in Paris.
So I would put the same question to America and to Americans!”
*****
At the beginning of today’s Press Conference in Santa Fe, Gorbachev defended Putin’s concern over USA building extensive missile defense systems in Eastern Europe, but said that it was good that Bush and Putin took the time to recently meet, once before Bush leaves office.
He also stated that the USA needs to “elect a President who gets along with the world, and doesn’t brandish a big stick and make threats.”
This is “up to the American people to persuade its leaders, and this burden can’t be shouldered by others.” After 15 years of “pushing” since leaving office in 1992, Gorbachev now believes that most world leaders and heads of state are “lagging,” and that what we need next is “planetary glasnost.”
He is encouraged by the progress in Russia of the political party he started, the Union of Social Democrats, given that more than 100 nations have the same kind of party, the Social Democrats. He said the history of the USSR was a 70 year experiment with Communism in its extreme Bolshevik form, and that Russia had “paid the price” for doing so.
Gorbachev reminisced on Yeltsin being pressured by the International Monetary Fund and a few US Think Tanks which came to impose on Russia a free market approach, which did a lot of good. He called it the “Washington Consensus” that was really the opposite ideology and effect of Bolshevism.
*****
I have met and talked with several Nobel Peace Laureates, as well as several others I thought should have won that honorable prize. The Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded to 95 individuals and 20 organizations since 1901.
The Laureates I have exchanged extensive correspondence with include His Holiness, the Dalai Lama, and Kofi Annan. I have talked at great length with Jody Williams. I asked Oscar Aria Sanchez, former-and-now-again President of Costa Rica, to help create a branch in Santa Fe of the United Nations University for Peace; Dag Hammarskjold’s nephew Knut was on the Board of Honorary Advisors of this conception, as was Gandhi’s grandson, Arun, and Einstein’s granddaughter, Evelyn. So was former USA Secretary of Interior, Stewart Udall.
As an organization making a huge difference in the world, Doctors without Borders is my highest inspiration daily in my work to get the neurotoxic and carcinogenic artificial sweetener, aspartame, off the market by rescinding its approval to be sold.
Mairead Corrigan of Ireland was the first Nobel Peace Laureate I talked with for several hours at the Second United Nations Special Session on Disarmament in 1978. I also had a very long conversation with Canada's Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, and I have always thought he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize. Certainly, George Mc Govern deserves something like a Nobel Peace Prize, for his lifetime of pacifism.
Yet somehow, today, former President Mikhail Gorbachev was the most compelling. I am certain that because I was asking on behalf of tens of millions of Americans and several billions people in hundreds of nations, that he really will help to advise and guide the next USA President to bring the USA out of the Middle East, and to end the war in Iraq.
There really is no choice.
This is a guest blog by Stephen Fox of Santa Fe. Guest blogs provide our readers a chance to express themselves on topics of interest to the political discourse here, and may or may not express the views of the DFNM blog. If you'd like to submit a post for consideration as a guest blog, contact me by clicking on the Email Me link on the upper left-hand corner of the page.
Technorati Tags: Mikhail Gorbachev Santa Fe New Mexico Middle East U.S. Military disarmament
April 15, 2008 at 01:35 PM in Current Affairs, Environment, Government, Guest Blogger, International Relations, Iraq War, Middle East, Military Affairs, Nuclear Arms, Power, Peace | Permalink
Comments
"that he really will help to advise and guide the next USA President to bring the USA out of the Middle East, and to end the war in Iraq."
That is the LEAST of our problems, and not what Gorbachev was trying to say.
More important was 'Why do you continue to build these weapons? This is amazing to me!
AND
"The next president must show courage and responsibility to resist increasing your arms expenditures. Most serious nations in the European Union are studying the proposal by Schultz and Kissinger, and the USA should heed this proposal."
The U.S., like the former Soviet Union has a delusional political and economic system based on pretend and make believe. I am reminded of the Doonesbury cartoon of Aug. 6, 2006 where the decider was asked "which do you prefer, admitting you're wrong or tearing the country apart?"
That question is equally applicable to all presidents except Carter, from Kennedy on.
Your effort to get aspartame off the market is commendable, and indicative of our countries delusion. Rather than dropping the ideological blinders as Gorbachev tried to do (and Deng Xiaping was successful at, when he stated "I don't care if it's a white cat or a black cat. It's a good cat so long as it catches mice." our government substitutes perception for reality- all that matters is what PR efforts cat get the public to believe.
We still are deluded into believing we have a market economy, yet allow folks like Donald Rumsfeld to pretend they are businessmen, when all they do is use government in the same way the Kremlin did, to create fantasy and delusion, and use government as a personal cash cow to create an "economic product" out of a known carcinogen.
And even more indicative of this delusion is that Fox did not ONCE mention LANL, where the fantasy is that by taking thousands of smart people out of productive use, by paying them more money, and forcing them to poison our resources and create an incredibly destructive arms race, we are able to delude ourselves into thinking LANL helps, rather than harms, economic well being in northern New Mexico. Less is indeed more in the world of governing by illusion. Under this marketing effort, as long as the government "pays more", we perceive ourselves to be better off when paid to "plant trees with the roots up", and ignore the dying crops, because "we have more money".
When we are that easily deluded, the $3 Trillion war in Iraq is trivial.
Posted by: erichwk | Apr 16, 2008 2:48:10 PM





















