« Bill Clinton Records Call, Sends Email Supporting Re-Election of Mayor Martin Chavez | Main | New Energy Economy Invites You to Vision Shift! Art in the Age of Climate Change »

Monday, October 05, 2009

Guest Blog by Rep. Brian Egolf: Time for Fairness and Sanity in our Tax Code

BrianEgolf2 This is a guest blog by State Representative Brian Egolf (D-Santa Fe).

Prepare to be shocked: Did you know that in New Mexico a family of four with taxable income of just $16,001 pays the same personal income tax rate as a family making $100,000, $250,000 or even $1 million? Under our state’s tax structure, the highest tax rate kicks in at $16,001. This means that a family of four living at or near the federal poverty level pays income tax at the highest New Mexico rate! This must change, for reasons of both fairness and fiscal soundness.

In New Mexico, our tax system is extremely regressive, which means that it requires low income earners to pay a higher percentage of their disposable income than high income earners. The effect of a regressive system is that low income earners feel the pinch of a tax bill far more than high income earners, and low income earners have far less money available for savings as a percentage of their income. Our federal taxes are just the opposite; they are progressive and ours should be too. With a progressive structure, you pay more only when you earn at a higher level. This is far fairer.

Because of our current dire budgetary predicament, we are facing a tax fairness train wreck: tax payers who saw the least benefit from our 2003 tax cuts are now facing the reality that they will feel the greatest impact from our spending cuts. Even though the great majority of the 2003 tax cuts went to high income earners, the largest impact of budget cuts will be felt by low income earners. For example, under the 2003 tax cuts, those making $295,000 or more pay $13,000 less every year in income taxes. The average New Mexican – earning between $30,000 and $45,000 – sees a savings of just $38 a year. The 40 percent of New Mexicans earning under $29,000 see no change at all in their tax bills. Yet, it is the people earning the lowest incomes that will feel the impact of spending cuts the most because they are the ones most likely to need the essential services that are being reduced or eliminated.

The 2003 tax cuts removed $450 million a year from our state’s revenues, which coincidentally, is about the amount of our current budget deficit. This budget gap has already led to funding cuts in education, health care, and public safety – all of which have a negative impact on the majority of New Mexicans. Even if you’re not directly impacted – you didn’t lose your job, you don’t rely on state-provided health care, and you don’t have children in public schools – you are indirectly impacted. When the state cuts spending, people lose jobs. The businesses and nonprofit organizations that have contracts with the state, for everything from supplying copy paper to giving kids immunizations, must cut back on their spending and hiring as well. Those who have lost their jobs most certainly cut back on their spending. All of this disruption in commerce digs us into a deeper hole, dragging the recession on longer.

Cuts to health care are felt the most – and not just by those who rely on Medicaid to keep their kids well and their elders in a nursing home. The higher our percentage of uninsured people, the higher the costs for those who do have health insurance. As health insurance costs continue to rise, more people lose their coverage, which raises the costs for everyone else.

No matter how the state collects income and gross receipts taxes, two issues are clear: enough revenue needs to be raised to pay for state services and programs, and the tax burdens and benefits need to be fairly shared. Our state must seize the opportunity presented by the current crisis to rebalance the tax burden by aligning our tax brackets along the lines of those at the federal level. At the same time, we must roll back a portion of the 2003 tax cuts to provide the revenue we need to continue to provide the essential services on which so many New Mexicans rely every day. Doing so now – in the special session only a few weeks away – will bring new fairness to our tax system while also bringing long-term fiscal responsibility to our budget.

When the state was flush with funds, the highest earning New Mexicans got the biggest benefit. Now times are tough, and those who got no benefit will suffer the consequences the most. That is unfair by any standard, and I will work to tip the scales back in favor of those who are long overdue for a fair shake from their state government.

This is a guest blog by State Representative Brian Egolf (D-Santa Fe). If you'd like to submit a piece for consideration as a guest blog, contact me by clicking on the Email Me link on the upper left-hand corner of the page.

To see a collection of guest blogs published on the DFNM blog, visit our archives.

October 5, 2009 at 12:10 AM in Children and Families, Economy, Populism, Guest Blogger, NM Legislature Special Session 2009, Taxes | Permalink

Comments

Thanks for pointing out the inherent unfairness of the NM tax code, Brian. Great post, and about time someone did something about it.

Posted by: KathyF | Oct 5, 2009 5:24:15 AM

The problem with taking from the rich to giving to the poor, is that no final line can be drawn that is not arbitrary.

All taxpayers paying at the same rate is at least logically defensible. Progressive tax rates cannot be defended by anything except feel good logic, and there is no where where a line can be drawn that does not feel good, at least for those to whom the wealth is being redistributed. As the deficit grows, more and more will be taken from the rich and given to the poor by means of progressively increasing tax rates.

If the process of raising tax rates progressively has no end, there will be no end. Ultimately, everything is taken from the haves and given to the havenots until everyone is a have not.

Where do you finally draw the line?

Posted by: ched macquigg | Oct 5, 2009 7:10:42 AM

A fair and progressive federal income tax has been the generator of all the good things in our country. It created the middle class and guess what gave the middle class more money to buy goods and services so our economy thrived. Ever since Reagan the federal tax code has gotten less and less progressive and our middle class has gotten smaller and smaller. Our entire economy is suffering from that.

Let's at least make our state income tax progressive again as Rep. Egolf suggests. Cutting funds for education, health care and services to our most vulnerable is not only unwise, it's unfair.

Posted by: No Education Cuts | Oct 5, 2009 8:48:25 AM

Rep. Egolf makes total sense with this post. I wish the NM Senate and Gov, Richardson would wake up. We can't go on giving away the store to our wealthiest New Mexicans and expect to have the services we need.

Posted by: Ken | Oct 5, 2009 10:00:34 AM

Actually, if you look at the law, it is over $24,000. Not $16,000. But the point is the same.

Posted by: Mark | Oct 5, 2009 10:57:03 AM

Mark,

It's $16,000 of taxable income, which can be the taxable income that derives from a gross income at $24,000. I chose to write about taxable income because it's easier than writing about gross and having to explain how different deductions affect the tax rate.

Thanks,
Brian

Posted by: Brian Egolf | Oct 5, 2009 1:29:36 PM

Thanks Rep. Egolf. I appreciate the clarification. It is still a disappointing tax system.

Posted by: Mark | Oct 5, 2009 3:36:08 PM

ched macquigg
By that logic, if the rich pays the same tax rate as the poor is fair then, we have to translate that same percentage to the cost of living. That would really be fair.
For example, a loaf of bread costs 3.00. If a person has say 100,000.00/yr. income, they would pay 3.00 for the bread. But if a person makes 10,000.00/yr. they would pay 30 cents for the bread.
See, the fairness?
This is ridiculous but the point is that a loaf of bread costs the same whatever your income. It hurts a low income person to keep food on the table but a wealthy person doesn't even feel it.
Likewise, having the same tax rate for disparate incomes is not felt the same. The sacrifice for living in our civilization must be felt by all who benefit from it.
The so called "poor" now of days are for the most part working people who contribute to our civilization. It is a known fact that wages have stagnated while the coffers of the wealthy have obscenely bloated with profit as productivity went up. This has proven unsustainable and it is time to correct this inequity.

Posted by: qofdisks | Oct 6, 2009 3:15:12 PM

Post a comment