« Live Blog and Audio at SFReeper from NM Senate Floor Today | Main | Guest Blog: March 10, 4th National Call-In Day and Fax your Health Insurance Bills to Congress! »
Sunday, March 08, 2009
ABQ Mayoral Race: Richard Romero Submits More than 1,000 Qualifying Contributions
On Friday, Richard Romero filed his first campaign contribution and signature report as required for mayoral candidates seeking to qualify for public financing under the Clean and Ethical Elections law. He submitted a total of 1,007 $5 qualifying contributions and 1,388 nominating petition signatures to the city clerk according to a statement from his campaign. Four more reports are due by the March 31 deadline. At that time, publicly financed candidates will have had to turn in 3,287 $5 qualifying contributions from Albuquerque voters in order to receive public financing.
“I am proud to be running as a Clean Election candidate. Through their $5 contributions, voters are sending a powerful and reaffirming message that they want to change the political campaign culture in New Mexico,” says Romero. “They’re saying that elected officials should be beholden to the average, every day citizen - not the big moneyed special interests."
“Each day our campaign is picking up momentum. We are building a strong and motivated grassroots effort, and we’re well on our way to reaching the contribution and signature requirements,” says Richard.
Candidates are required to turn in weekly reports to the City Clerk each Friday leading up to the March 31 deadline to track their progress in collecting contributions.
How You Can Help: To learn how you can help the Romero for Mayor campaign, contact Field Director Nina Simbaña at nsimbana@gmail.com or 507-5143. The campaign office is located at Richard 4605 4th St NW, Suite A (south of Griegos, on the west side of the street). Click for a map. Hours are 8:30 AM-7 PM (M-Thursday); 8:30 AM-5 PM (Friday); 10 AM-5 PM (Saturday); and 12 PM-7 PM (Sunday)
Stop by the campaign office and donate $5 TODAY and/or pick up a Friends and Family Packet, collect ten $5 contributions and return it to the campaign in one week.
Richard is a former teacher and principal. He served as President Pro Tem of the NM state Senate from 2001 to 2004. He is from Albuquerque’s Barelas neighborhood and lives downtown with his wife, Margie.
Richard has been an advocate of public financing since he served in the State Senate. In 2005, he fought for the successful passage of the Albuquerque Clean Elections law. Romero’s Change Agenda focuses on job creation, cleaning up city hall and cutting government waste, improving education, and smarter strategies for combating crime.
Richard is facing City Councilors Debbie O’Malley and Michael Cadigan, Rep. R.J. Berry, and Rob Dixon in the nonpartisan race. Mayor Marty Chavez has not declared whether he will seek a fourth term as mayor. Albuquerque’s municipal election will be held on October 6, 2009.
Romero has lined up impressive support for his candidacy. His Steering Committee, which is still in formation, includes: State Senator Jerry Ortiz y Pino, State Senator Cisco McSorley, State Rep. Mimi Stewart, State Senator Eric Griego, State Senator Tim Keller, former State Senator Tito Chavez, former U.S. Senator Fred Harris, New Mexico Secretary of Education Veronica Garcia, AMAFCA Director Danny Hernandez, CNM Board member Blair Kaufman, CNM Board member Carmie Toulouse, APS Board member Lorenzo Garcia, Ralph Arellanes, Lydia Ashanin, Pat Baca, Mercy Berman, Fabrizio Bertoletti, Dr. Mustafa Beyyette, Eleanor Bratton, Dr. Teresa Brito-Asenap, Pat Bryan, Phil Ewing, Ramona Torres Ford, Michelle Garcia, Robert Garcia, Richard L. Gonzales, Earl Holmes, Lou Hoffman, David Kleinfeld, Ted Martinez, Mary Molina Mescall, Dr. John Mondragon, Bill Moye, Toots Obenshain, Michael Passi, Dr. Steve Pilon, Kim Posich, Stephanie Poston, Tey Diana Rebolledo, Giovanna Rossi, Frank Sedillo, Orlie Sedillo, Orlando Vigil, Gregory Webb, Ann Yegge, Kim Zamarin
March 8, 2009 at 02:10 PM in 2009 Albuquerque Mayoral Race | Permalink
Comments
It will be interesting to see if he can get enough signatures. I was lambasted on this forum previously for questioning the "change" aspect of Romero's message. I find it ironic that the candidate of change can't even rally enough support to find volunteers to collect his signatures: he is forced to resort to paying people to collect them. If he was truly a "grassroots" candidate and "active" in the Obama campaign one would assume the thousands of Obama volunteers in Albuquerque would assist Romero: especially considering Marty's support of Clinton.
Posted by: young dem | Mar 9, 2009 10:42:30 AM
Unfortunately too many Obama volunteers are known for working for Obama only and not getting involved in local politics. young dem-what candidate are you volunteering for?
Its always hard to get volunteers for contests below presidential or congressional status. Ask any of the candidates for mayor except for Marty Chavez who "encourages" city workers to do it.
Posted by: Old Dem | Mar 9, 2009 11:16:44 AM
I volunteered hundreds of hours last year helping the following campaigns: Obama, Heinrich, Udall, Teague, Victor Raigoza, Teresa Zanetti, Kari Brandenburg, Jason Marks, and Tim Eichenberg. I would volunteer for one of the mayoral campaigns if I liked any of the candidates. The only thing I think Romero can acomplish is an expensive run off election where he is soundly defeated by Chavez.
Posted by: young dem | Mar 9, 2009 1:11:03 PM
That's the spirit young dem! Admit defeat so that lets you off the hook from doing anything!
I'm going to work hard for Richard Romero. He has strong support from most of the people respect and he has an organized and vigorous campaign and staff. Don't listen to naysayers like young dem. He probably works for Chavez.
Posted by: LM | Mar 9, 2009 1:47:26 PM
That's the spirit, LM! Attack and belittle those on the same broad team as yours!
Oh, and be sure to make insipid speculations like "He probably works for Chavez." Nicely played, LM. I'm sure your comments have gotten many, many folks thinking "Hey, I want to work hard for Richard Romero now..that campaign has such inclusive, factually-based commenters working for them!"
Posted by: scot | Mar 9, 2009 4:41:12 PM
Here I thought it was young dem who was belittling the grassroots focus of Romero's campaign. Who are you working for scot?
Posted by: LM | Mar 9, 2009 6:11:35 PM
Richard Romero is the best mayor's candidate by far. He's honest, hard working, progressive and he can win. I also like Debbie O'Malley but I don't think she can win,
Posted by: Ron in Eunice | Mar 9, 2009 6:39:09 PM
Oh, it's pretty obvious I'm working for Chavez as well, isn't it? I mean, everyone who disagrees with you must be.
Read your post again, LM. You come off sounding like a jerk. It has nothing to do with who one "works for". The guy doesn't care for Romero...it's an option in this country, to disagree with you. I hope so..I'm not that excited about Romero, either.
LM, I'm not criticizing you for supporting Romero. Or working for him. I'd just like to see the same courtesy given to those who happen to support other candidates, especially those largely of the same political stripe.
As for me, given the time I'd probably be working for O'Malley this go-round...but I'm more than interested to hear why another candidate would be preferable.
Posted by: scot | Mar 9, 2009 6:40:14 PM
Get over it Scot. This is a place for opinions. People argue and spout at times. It is really that upsetting to you? Politics is always rough. It's the nature of the game.
Posted by: JJ | Mar 9, 2009 7:15:17 PM
JJ: It doesn't bother me per se, but I must say I do prefer the public policy over the straight politics. Governing over getting elected and all that. Still, when you've got several candidates of a similar stripe (Romero, O'Malley, some might say Cadigan, etc.) why go about shooting each other when we're going to need everybody we can get to take down Marty?
I'll go back to lurking now. Have fun, folks.
Posted by: scot | Mar 9, 2009 7:53:33 PM
LM, I will try and educate you. Your form of reasoning is called Eurocentric Binary: if you aren't for us you are against us. Your logic is just as fallacious as, "love it or leave it". I have stated many times on this forum I don't care for Mayor Chavez. Last time I checked there were 6 candidates in the race for ABQ mayor. I don't care for any of them. I don't work for Mayor Chavez and I have never voted for him. I am glad there are so many rabid Romero fans. It is nice to be able to support a candidate. I will hold my nose when I go to the ballot box.
Scot, it is nice to see someone else with reason on this forum.
Posted by: young dem | Mar 10, 2009 8:17:15 AM
young dem - If you want your comments to be treated seriously maybe you should argue for or against a candidate according to their positions on the issues. All you are doing is mocking and saying Romero cannot get the required signatures.
All the challenger candidates are finding it difficult to get the donations and signatures they need in the short time they're given to do it. This is more a reflection of how hard it is to get people to volunteer and get involved in a local and non-presidential race than anything else.
I've heard it's hard to get people to give the $5 donation because they don't understand public financing and how it works. Too bad our newspaper and TV "news" don't do more to educate the public on this but they are against public financing.
I wonder how anyone can be strongly against any candidate at this point without hearing them speak on the issues or debate with the other candidates.
Let's be reasonable folks.
Posted by: Old Dem | Mar 10, 2009 8:57:19 AM
It's impressive to me that legislators I trust are supporting Romero. Senators Jerry Ortiz y Pino, Cisco McSorley, Eric Griego and Tim Keller, and Rep. Mimi Stewart are all on Romero's steering committee. This shows me he is for transparency and ethics in city government.
Former U.S. Senator and presidential candidate Fred Harris supports Romero too and he has long been a force for progressive change and government by the people.
Posted by: Chris | Mar 10, 2009 11:08:43 AM
I will refrain from posting here in the future as this forum is reserved for sycophancy. I would love to debate the "issues" but here is all we have from the Romero campaign:
"As mayor, Richard will lead Albuquerque through the ongoing economic crisis. Richard will campaign to create new jobs for Albuquerque, reduce government waste, improve our education system, and cut the growing crime rate."
https://www.nmfbihop.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2468
And finally, the progressive, grassroots candidate of change voted with Manny Aragon 90% of the time. Romero's defense:
"Manny Aragon is a Democrat and even though I may have voted with him 90 percent of the time, I voted against him when it came to leadership of the Senate," I voted for him before I voted against him?
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/782094/posts
I definitely support blind partisanship. Why don't we just vote between the red and blue M&Ms.
Chao...and my guess is that Old Dem is Don Schiff.
Posted by: young dem | Mar 10, 2009 11:16:50 AM
Now you are linking to the rightwing freeper website? Wow. That says something.
Of course Romero voted with Aragon on many issues as most Democrats did. But he stuck his neck out to defeat Aragon for Senate Pro Tem. This was courageous and meant putting his future on the line to fight the machine bosses.
Why not contact the Romero campaign if you want to know more about his positions? 573-5649.
I don't understand why you think it's "syncophancy" when people comment about their opinions and views on here. Is anyone who doesn't agree with you a "syncophant"? It's "blind partisanship" to support a candidate? You aren't making too much sense.
Romero's steering committee has many Dems who are known for pushing hard for change and taking on the powers that be. You need to think about what you're saying. It doesn't match the facts.
Posted by: JJ | Mar 10, 2009 11:35:48 AM