« 11th Annual Community Holiday Dance & Gala Celebration for Peace & Justice | Main | NM-03: Wiviott Files Papers to Enter Congressional Race in Northern NM »

Monday, November 19, 2007

NM-Sen: Chavez Town Hall Provides Glimpse of Campaign Themes

Mchavez1Last week, the Marty Chavez for U.S. Senate campaign conducted a live online "town hall" with Mayor Chavez (right). It was obvious from listening to what Chavez had to say -- and what some of his obvious supporters typed into the comments screen -- that two of his main campaign talking points in the early going will be that "Udall cut funding for Los Alamos National Labs" and that Marty is proud to be a "native son" with longstanding Hispanic roots in New Mexico.

Of course Chavez also hit on this election cycle's mainstream Dem themes during the online event -- bringing the troops home from Iraq, providing universal access to health care, promoting renewable energy and finally getting rid of the incompetence and dishonesty of the Bush administration. Those are givens, where the devil is in the details and the real test comes if and when the candidate gets to Washington to reveal them. After all, anyone can say anything or promise anything during runups to elections, and they do.

But in trying to communicate distinctions between himself and primary rival Rep. Tom Udall (NM-03), Chavez has been focused on suggesting that Udall won't do a good job of representing the interests of New Mexico. Why? Because Udall voted recently against sacrificing more money to fund the on-its-last-legs plutonium pit nuke weapon mission of Los Alamos -- preferring to push a new mission of renewable energy development for the labs to increase their chances of survival. And because Udall wasn't born here in the state. Chavez spent the early minutes of the town hall describing his family's origins here and his experiences growing up in state.

Udall's Roots and Popularity in NM
Using this kind of spin against Udall is problematic at best. Udall is one of the most popular political figures in the state -- across the board -- and his family has pioneer roots that go back a long way. He has a distinctly Western sensibility -- reserved, low key and statesmanlike. While representing New Mexico's 3rd Congressional District, he's had strong support from Hispanics, Native Americans and Anglos alike.

As discussed by David Roybal of the Albuquerque Journal, "Elected attorney general in 1990, Udall got more votes than any other Democrat in a statewide race. In 1994, only Court of Appeals candidate Richard Bosson collected more votes. Democrat Jeff Bingaman, in his successful re-election bid for the U.S. Senate that year, got nearly 30,000 fewer votes than Udall." Contrast these results with Chavez's performance in his only state level race -- for Governor in 1998 -- when he lost to Repub Gary Johnson by a margin of 55% to 45% statewide, and by 58% to 42% in Albuquerque's Bernalillo County, where he lives.

Tuwmembersofziapueblo
Udall and Zia Pueblo members celebrate ribbon cutting for Ojito Wilderness Area

To the Left or Repub-Lite?
Even though Chavez continues to try and advance the notion that Udall is "too far to the left" for New Mexico voters, he isn't delineating how he significantly differs with Udall on the majority of the positions he's discussed so far. Does that make Chavez "too far to the left" too? Just asking. So far, on paper, the primary foes don't look that different in terms of their public expressions on major issues. However, in reality we all know that Chavez operates in Republican-lite land much of the time -- especially in terms of being what he calls "pro-business" and what others often call "in the pocket of big donors and sprawl developers." Since he doesn't want to dwell on that orientation much, at least in the primary race, Chavez will apparently stay with the lab cuts and native son mantras for now.

Green or Greenwashed?
Another theme he hit on a lot during the town hall had to do with his "green" achievements. Even though many see a number of Marty's claims in this area to be mostly "greenwashing" -- given his never-ending support for sprawl development and roads through where he wants them to go -- he likes to list off all the awards and top ten listings the city has received during the Marty years. He's been working on that front for some time now, building up resume material for his now abandoned 2010 run for governor. Again, what candiates look like on paper and how they operate in the real world is often at odds. Granted, Chavez has done some good things in this area, but they've often been offset by his actions to promote unlimited growth policies. For example, it's a positive thing to push for water savings, but that effort loses its luster when you are supportive of fast and furious growth that adds thousands of new users to the system.

Chavez may well encounter more problems in this area as time goes on. For instance, he boasts about his role in securing a new supply of drinking water for Albuquerque from the Rio Grande via the San Juan - Chama watershed. If he supports funding for expanded plutonium pit production and other nuke weapons work by Los Alamos labs, there's a real danger that radionuclides and chemicals used in such processes may travel into the Rio Grande and pollute Albuquerque's primary drinking water source. It's hard to have it both ways.

Regardless, it will be difficult indeed for Chavez to trump the reputation and achievements of Tom Udall and his family relatated to conservation and the environment, stretching back to Toms' dad Stewart and his Uncle Mo. The family's green credientials are impressive and long-standing, with an innovative environmental record that goes back to the 1960s and continues to this day with Tom, as well as cousin Mark, who's running for U.S. Senate in Colorado.

Fit for the Senate?
Not every native son (or daughter) has the right qualifications, skills and persona to be a strong and effective Senator, no matter how deep their roots go. After all, a Senate gig is primarily a collaborative and collegial post, where gaining the respect of your fellow Senators, working well with others and negotiating honestly and personably over time are necessities for success. Udall has been known for operating in this manner for years, earning high marks from almost everyone he's worked with both inside and outside the government.

Marty, on the other hand, is known for being relentlessly stubborn about getting his way, lousy at negotiating with people whose opinions differ with his, pushy to the point of rudeness in trying to advance his agenda and prone to avenging perceived slights along the way. I can't see his personal traits and habits being a good match for those valued in the U.S. Senate.

In a campaign visit up to Farmington last Friday, Chavez himself drew attention to his pugnatious style:

"I tend to get done what I say I'm going to do. I'm a bit of a bulldog in that regard. I believe strongly once you've made a decision, unless something unusual pops up, you stick to it and you stay on it like a laser. It tends to get done."

Chavez, who describes himself as being "pretty hard-headed," believes he can beat Udall during the primary.

We'll see, especially as the campaign trail brings out more of the nitty gritty in the candidates' personas and styles, as well as a deeper comparison of their records in the real world.

The Marty Chavez for Senate campaign just launched its new website, and celebrated the grand opening of its Albuquerque campaign office Saturday morning. has the story. A new , one of the founders of the Draft Udall movement, looks at another aspect of Marty's campaign website.

Rep. Tom Udall officially filed the necessary papers this past Friday to run for U.S. Senate and will formally announce his candidacy sometime over Congress' Thanksgiving recess.

To read our previous coverage of the 2008 U.S. Senate race in New Mexico visit our archive.

November 19, 2007 at 09:50 AM in 2008 NM Senate Race | Permalink

Comments

I would like to know why Tom Udall voted to table the Kucinich resolution to impeach VP Cheney, and I would like to know where Marty Chavez stands on impeachment.

Lying us into war is a very serious matter, and if it is case that the Bush administration has indeed done this, then they need to be prosecuted, and not given the benefit of the doubt.

Trust in leadership is essential to our democracy, and it is incredibly fractured at this time. Unity cannot happen when half the population believes the country is led by liars, scoundrels and murderers.

It may seem strategic to just go along to get along, but each day that passes further erodes the unity of America. Anything other than supporting impeachment is just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Posted by: | Nov 19, 2007 11:04:50 AM

We're less than a year away from elections. To impeach now would be counter productive and would only be a good tactic at this point if we want to lose the 2008 elections. To be for or against any candidate because of a single issue is unwise to say the least. Start looking at the big picture and what we have to lose.

Posted by: Realist | Nov 19, 2007 11:10:20 AM

I don't believe for a minute that following the oath of office that everyone elected to congress took to protect the Constitution and follow the rule of law should EVER be considered counter productive. Considering impeachment in terms of loosing or winning elections is NOT what the founders had in mind when they included that tool in the Constitution, framing it that way is plain WRONG. Fact is, impeachment is the moral duty of all of the House members regardless of party and or if it will or won't help advance their party at election time. Why Udall voted with many of his Democratic colleagues to table the impeachment bill for Cheney I don't know, regardless, that issue is irrelevant to his run for the Senate as far as I am concerned. IMO, what could loose the White House for the Democratic Party is their unwillingness to stand firm against the Bu$h Admin on removing the troops from their occupation in Iraq and their willingness to capitulate every time the Republics whine and cry about something.

Posted by: VP | Nov 19, 2007 12:08:14 PM

There are complicated factors around impeachment at this point in time. Do you want to risk another 8 years of a Republican in office just to make yourself feel good? The votes aren't there for impeachment period. In the meantime I wish more people would work for good Democrats like Udall so we could take back the Senate by enough votes to matter. I'll bet anything most of the people pushing for impeachment over and over haven't done one thing to help any candidate.

Posted by: Realist | Nov 19, 2007 12:19:06 PM

Chavez has some nerve trying to trade on his Hispanic name to convince people to vote for him. I don't care what kind of last name he has or doesn't have he's been a very antiprogressive mayor in so many ways.

Posted by: I Vote | Nov 19, 2007 12:26:40 PM

I guess Chavez would prefer we keep funding for bringing a new line of nuclear weapons on line despite the treaties we've signed and make Los Alamos into another filthy Rocky Flats in Colorado. No way.

Posted by: El Norteno | Nov 19, 2007 3:01:41 PM

"Do you want to risk another 8 years of a Republican in office just to make yourself feel good? That is nothing but a straw man BS argument, and BTW impeachment has NOTHING to do with "feeling good" and everything to do with "doing what's right" and what the Constitution requires. How can you make the claim (don't have the votes) when you have NO IDEA where the evidence will lead once the articles of impeachment are introduced and hearings begin?

Posted by: VP | Nov 20, 2007 7:24:58 AM

I supported impeachment in the past but even I think it's too late now and the votes to get it going in the House aren't there.

It's awful that Democrats didn't push it hard earlier but with Pelosi being so unreasonable and too many others acting like cowards, it was not to be. The question is what do we do now?

I think we can use our energies better by pushing the Democrats to vote the right way on other legislation like further war funding and work for better Democrats to get elected in 2008. I don't think we have the luxury of tilting at windmills at this point. I hate to admit that but I think it's true.

Posted by: Old Dem | Nov 20, 2007 11:12:05 AM

"Marty is proud to be a "native son" with longstanding Hispanic roots in New Mexico"

Yeah, so what? Is the Democratic party in New Mexico some kind of exclusive Hispanic social club or something? Personally, I'm a bit more trusting of someone who has made a conscious decision to be a New Mexican over someone who trys to play the "native son" bit and may in fact lack to courage or initiative to explore other options.

Posted by: Rodney | Nov 20, 2007 11:18:31 AM

Are you kidding? So now being a native should work against you? Because you made the conscious decision to stay and work to improve the state you were born in somehow makes you a lesser candidate? Sorry, that argument holds no water. There are plenty of policy reasons to vote against Marty. To bring up the fact that he is native and/or has a hispanic last name are VERY weak arguments indeed. Aren't we all helped by engaging in a discussion based on fact and reason rather than these ridiculous non-arguments. This pettiness doesn't help anyone. (I feel like Gov. Richardson).

Posted by: snork | Nov 20, 2007 11:38:27 AM

Its NOT being a native that is the problem, its USING that to try and generate votes over more important and valid considerations like ethics and position on issues.

Posted by: VP | Nov 20, 2007 1:22:25 PM

It is Marty himself who keeps repeating he's a native son with deep roots in New Mexico. We're just commenting on that. It's HIS choice to define himself that way, which tells you something about him doesn't it?

Posted by: | Nov 20, 2007 1:23:12 PM

"To bring up the fact that he is native and/or has a hispanic last name are VERY weak arguments indeed."

Exactly. Thanks snork, for reitterating my point.

Posted by: Rodney | Nov 20, 2007 2:30:11 PM

So if the candidate himself is pushing his Hispanic heritage as one of the main reasons people should vote for him we should refuse to point out that's what he's doing? He's obviously doing it because he's playing that card and has little else to recommend him to voters.

Posted by: | Nov 20, 2007 2:40:48 PM

Post a comment