David Rosales Marty Chavez Eric Griego Martin Heinrich

« New Mexico State Auditor Hector Balderas Announces Run for Second Term | Main | Center for Civic Policy Weighs in on Winning Lawsuit Against Mary Herrera, Gary King »

Monday, August 03, 2009

Victory: U.S. District Court Grants NM Youth Organized and SWOP Summary Judgment in Nonprofit Suit

Note: Also see our later post which includes a statement about the decision issued by the Center for Civic Policy.

Today, the Honorable Judith C. Herrera of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order that grants summary judgment to the plaintiffs New Mexico Youth Organized (as project of the Center for Civic Policy) and Southwest Organizing Project in their suit against Secretary of State Mary Herrera.

The lawsuit was a response to Herrera sending a letter to the nonprofits threatening to prosecute or otherwise sanction them for their failure to register and report as political committees. The plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment stating that certain provisions of New Mexico's Campaign reporting Act are unconstitutional, either facially or as applied to them, and claimed Herrera's threatened action pursuant to the Act violated their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Click to read the entire 30-page ruling.

The Secretary of State had reportedly based her demand that the nonprofits file as PACs on the odd -- to say the least -- opinion of Attorney General Gary King. King said he thought the nonprofits had been acting politically when they sent out educational direct mail pieces months before a pending election to the districts of a handful of legislators. The pieces dealt with the legislators' votes on certain bills, and how the votes correlated with the interests of some of their large campaign donors. The only clear reason AG King cited to explain his view was that if something walks like a duck and acts like a duck, it's a duck. I guess he was wrong -- at least according to the judgment of the U.S. District Court.

Quack, quack!

After reviewing the motions, briefs, attachments, and affidavits, and being otherwise fully informed, the Court finds that Defendant has not met its burden to demonstrate the constitutionality of the challenged statute, and therefore finds that Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is well taken and will be granted. Because the grant of summary judgment accords Plaintiffs all of the relief that they seek, their motion for preliminary injunction is denied as moot.

The original complaints to AG King about the mailings came from former State Senator Shannon Robinson, who ended up being defeated in the 2008 Democratic Primary election by now Sen. Tim Keller, and Dem Sen. Bernadette Sanchez, who was reelected to her seat in 2008.

For more background on this matter, see these previous DFNM blog posts:

August 3, 2009 at 12:30 PM in Civil Liberties, Corporatism, Ethics & Campaign Reform, Government, Justice, Legal Issues, Progressivism | Permalink

Comments

Quack, quack is right! The attacks on the nonprofits fueled by Gary King and carried out by Mary Herrera were silly on their face. I think this case shows that King and Herrera are NOT on the side of ethics and campaign reform and hit at those who are.

King and Herrera are old machine politicians. They need to stop trying to kill the strong movement for transparency and truth in government.

Posted by: Esq. | Aug 3, 2009 1:06:18 PM

Congratz to you guys. I've crossed swords enough with some of y'all on this issue and after everything I stirred up on here I felt I should come in and say "y'all were right and my take was wrong," as was borne out today.

B (on my lunch break)

Posted by: Benson | Aug 3, 2009 1:21:06 PM

Thanks, Benson. It shows you are a classy individual to come back here and say what you did. I appreciate it and there are no hard feelings.

Posted by: barb | Aug 3, 2009 1:30:04 PM

Thanks Barb, I dunno about "classy," some of the others might beg to differ. ;) Passionate yeah, even if I'm on the wrong side. Again, I apologize for being a jerk.

B

Posted by: Benson | Aug 3, 2009 1:48:23 PM

The truth comes out at last! We all knew King and Herrera had no case. That's why they never gave any reasons that pass legal muster for putting the pressure on the non-profits. They were made the money guys lost and the clean government candidates won and they took action without any principles. Shame on Mary Herrera but more on AG Gary King. You've been found out Gary. You used to be one of the good guys but now you are in the mud.

Posted by: Old Dem | Aug 3, 2009 2:11:55 PM

Bigger jerks: Mary and Gary.

Posted by: bg | Aug 3, 2009 2:13:05 PM

Can we get a real Democrat to run against Gary King in the Democratic primary for AG? Please

Posted by: SCC | Aug 3, 2009 2:33:22 PM

I see Monahan is whining. All his predictions were dead wrong. Hey Joe: Nobody cares if you think the materials sent out were "electioneering." You're not a lawyer. You're not neutral. You hang with the sharks who got beaten because they are lazy crooks.

Posted by: Hey Joe | Aug 4, 2009 10:50:33 AM