David Rosales Marty Chavez Eric Griego Martin Heinrich

« Espanola Mayor Joseph Maestas Weighing Run as NM Lt. Guv | Main | Sunday Reading: Is Obama Punking Us? by Frank Rich »

Saturday, August 08, 2009

Bingaman Fades; The Corrupt Core of the U.S. Senate Comes Into Full View; Is Obama One of Them?

Hcreform

Something tells me that, UNLESS I SEE DEMOCRATS FIGHTING and ADVOCATING PUBLICLY FOR THE PUBLIC OPTION AND REAL HEALTH CARE REFORM, I'll be one of those people at the handful of town halls we'll be offered who'll be chanting JUST SAY NO. For different reasons than the teabaggers, but just about as vehemently. What is being agreed to now by corporate shills in the dark recesses of the Capitol cannot be allowed to stand.

This morning I am thinking of all the wonderful, hard-working, honest, compassionate and well-informed people who have worked for years -- some for many decades -- to achieve for Americans what every single other advanced Democracy already has: a health care system that is affordable and provides high quality care to everyone, rich or poor, sick or well. The dedicated and passionately executed work of all those advocates and ordinary citizens is right now being undercut and mocked by the corrupt and venal forces who run the U.S. Senate -- and maybe even the White House. Who is fighting for the people? You tell me. When push comes to shove, they all seem ready to fall in line with the corporatist juggernaut.

BingamanSen. Jeff Bingaman took it upon himself to break the news to New Mexicans in a thoroughly maddening interview with the Albuquerque Journal this Saturday morning. He didn't speak to those who have worked so long and hard for genuine health care reform. He didn't come out and meet his constituents face to face. He didn't send any direct messages to his supporters. No, he chose the compromised defender of all things corporatist -- the Albuquerque Journal -- to print his words of betrayal.

BaucusOh, the Senator -- you know, in his heart of hearts -- supports the public option. But not enough to advocate in public for the necessity of having it in any bill that can pass muster as anything resembling genuine health care reform. No, he now believes we can achieve very much the same results with so-called "nonprofit co-ops" -- a creepy dodge of real reform devised by the insurance industry. The goal? To trick the people into thinking there is something being done to blunt the greed-fueled money grubbing of the corporate interests. The Senator surely knows this is the case, and yet he has the nerve to tell the interviewer that everything is fine, and we can depend on the "negotiations" of the Gang of Six oinkers who have been giving away the store for months and months, behind closed doors. Without even the imput of the rest of the Senate Finance Committee. At the direction of the Max Baucus-Kent Conrad-Charles Grassley donation-sucking machine -- assisted by Rahm Emanuel. By some of the very worst members of a U.S. Senate packed with the corrupt, the compromised and the arrogant.

ConradIt's finally clear -- the dream of Democrats in power, working to represent the will of the people regarding health care reform, is dead. Instead, we are going to get a "reform" bill crafted in every detail by Big Pharma, the mega-insurance corporations and every entrenched interest in the provider network. We are going to get a bill written with the lobbyists at the table, serviced by those like the craven Max Baucus and Kent Conrad, and designed to shovel huge quantities of cash into the coffers of the "industry," while putting a stop to every single provision that could conceivably force them to cut their monstrous profits to a justifiable level.

GrassleyCrInstead, all of the "savings" will be taken from Medicare, Medicaid and our hides. Because, you know, we cannot abide forcing the profit slobberers to live like moral human beings. The business of America is business -- and maximizing profits for big business no matter how many people it maims or kills.

The headline screams at the top of the paper: BINGAMAN: 'PUBLIC OPTION' ON THE ROPES. Read it and weep.

So does Bingaman complain about the awful forces working against real change? No, he defends them and lies to claim the "co-ops" will do pretty much the same thing a public option would. Right, that's why the Baucus crooks will have no part of a real public option, but think the co-ops would be peachy keen. Do you think we're that stupid, Senator? Some quotes from Bingaman:

... says he still supports a so-called "public option" coverage plan but that overall Senate support is fading.

... said a compromise proposal to establish health care co-ops, or nonprofit, member-operated health cooperatives, to compete with insurers could achieve many of the same goals.

... I voted for a public option and I prefer a public option, but you could make a good case you could accomplish a lot of the same things through this mechanism.

... "I don't think its dead in the water," Bingaman said of the public option, "but there is a lot of opposition."

... said he would not oppose a bill simply because it did not contain a public option.

And then there's this topper:

"I don't know of any Republican in the Senate who has said they would support a public option, and several Democrats have said they would not. As they learn more about what's involved, those views could change [emphasis mine]."

Can you beat that? At this late date, when the Senate just went into recess, Bingaman thinks the bought-off Senate racketeers may suddenly have a change of heart once they're educated about the public option? What the hell does he think has been going on for months, with real Democrats, nurses, doctors with morality and advocates for real health care reform flooding the nation and the Congress with the facts? Does Bingaman really believe it's a matter of better education on the public option? If so, why isn't he willing to do that -- by speaking out on the details, by holding public town halls to inspire people to take a stand, to go on TV and tell the truth?

No Public Events for Bingaman
Get this. Despite the fact that Bingaman is one of the chosen (by whom?) Senators who have met behind closed doors for what seems like eons to draft the Senate Finance Committee bill -- he doesn't feel obliged to schedule a single public event in New Mexico during the August recess. It's not in the online Journal as far as I can tell -- just in the paper -- but here's what Bingaman's office says about what he'll be doing this month:

Sen. Jeff Bingaman does not host town hall forums, and instead prefers to meet with small constituent groups. Bingaman's staff encouraged constituents to contact his office to relay concerns, or to request a meeting: http://bingaman.senate.gov.

Notice you haven't heard of this before now. I wonder which "constituents" Bingaman has decided to meet with. You can guess, can't you? He'll probably be partying down with all the big donors from the health care "industry" to celebrate how well the public has been snookered by the special interests. Yahoo! Another win for the entrenched, corrupt big money players! No reason to worry boys! You KNEW in the end we'd topple real health care reform in favor of more money for the usual suspects!

Oh, and don't forget you can request a meeting with Jeff. Well, except I've heard those slots were all filled weeks ago. You know how it's done. And in the final indignity to the little people, Bingaman's office told me they don't -- as a matter of policy -- release his schedule. So we don't know where Bingaman will be traveling this month, we don't know who he'll be meeting with and we don't get to see him at any public events. How convenient. Hey, Senator, why not just spend the recess in Martha's Vineyard or flyfishing at Max Baucus' ranch in Montana like the rest of the monied movers and shakers, and not even pretend to serve the riff-raff in your district?

Where's President Change-We-Can-Believe-In?
President Obama -- who has never taken a strong stand on any detailed provisions he is ready to fight for in a reform bill -- seems totally content to accept a watered-down, lobbyist-written bill as some kind of "success." He seems to want a notch on his belt for "health care reform" even if the bill he signs may well do more harm than good after the industry hacks get done with it. A bill without any effective way to rein in the exploding pricing of the private insurers? Who cares! We'll take our "savings" out of Medicare, Medicaid and those other "entitlement" programs used by low-income and middle class Americans. After all, the corporatists on both sides of the aisle can't stand that kind of spending. There aren't any rich, elite lobbyists throwing money to members of Congress from the "entitlement" side.

The Gang of Six met with Obama on Thursday at the White House to give him an update.

"He encouraged us to keep up the effort, and try to find something we felt comfortable with [emphasis mine]," Bingaman said.

We wouldn't want the Senators to feel uncomfortable about sticking a knife into the backs of health care reformers and sick people everywhere, now would we? Well, we did learn this week that Obama had already given away the store months ago to Billy Tauzin and Big Pharma behind closed doors in the White House. He made a secret deal with the drug bigwigs, pledging that he wouldn't "allow" Congress to give Medicare the right to negotiate drug prices with the handful of drugmakers that dominate the world.

Remember way back in the days of HOPE, when Obama pledged to the American people that he would never allow legislation to be written by lobbyists -- you know, the way George Bush did it? Now, with each passing day, we are seeing more and more evidence that Obama and his Senate co-conspirators have done just that. Once again I quote one of my favorite members of Congress -- one who has the heart and soul and guts to be a real Democrat, a real progressive, a real representative of Hispanics and all Americans:

In an interview on Wednesday, Representative Raul M. Grijalva, the Arizona Democrat who is co-chairman of the House progressive caucus, called Mr. Tauzin’s comments “disturbing.”

“We have all been focused on the debate in Congress, but perhaps the deal has already been cut,” Mr. Grijalva said. “That would put us in the untenable position of trying to scuttle it.”

He added: “It is a pivotal issue not just about health care. Are industry groups going to be the ones at the table who get the first big piece of the pie and we just fight over the crust?

Sure seems like it to me. Now the question becomes whether we want to support a tarnished, watered down, pseudo-reform bill that may give our President and Congressional Dems a hollow victory, but do very little to enact the health care system overhaul we need. We've seen how the reform bill passed by Massachusetts -- which looks very much like the "compromise" bill shaping up in Senate Finance -- has resulted in skyrocketing costs and heaps of dinero for the for-profit industry, while failing to achieve universal coverage. 

Is this what we want on a national basis? I don't think so.

I think we need to push our members of Congress harder than ever before to demand that a strong public option be included in any bill they vote for. Period. Without it, we have nothing but faux-reform, drafted by the greedy profit suckers for the greedy profit suckers. Do you agree?

We've already compromised hugely with the White House and the corporate medical-industrial-technology complex on the best way to reform health care coverage -- a single payer system. We've been pushed to accept a public option instead, and we've watched as that's been side-swiped and weakened by the DC lobbying command center. Now we're being told we can't even have that crumb. Enough is enough.

As I said at the beginning of this post -- something tells me that, UNLESS I SEE DEMOCRATS FIGHTING and ADVOCATING PUBLICLY FOR THE PUBLIC OPTION AND REAL REFORM, I'll be one of those people at the handful of town halls we'll be offered who'll be chanting JUST SAY NO. For different reasons than the teabaggers, but just about as vehemently. 

Are you with me?

August 8, 2009 at 11:49 AM in Corporatism, Healthcare, NM Congressional Delegation, Obama Health Care Reform, Sen. Jeff Bingaman | Permalink

Comments

Barb: I think you just about summed it up here. Nice work. Nice summation of an abomination.

P.S.: I will disagree on one thing. I'm not so big on "town hall meetings" and am perfectly fine with "gangs of X". It all depends on what the "gangs" come up with. FDR ran some "gangs" (some consisted of just about one person). Having "town halls" just seems wimpy, indecisive and a tad disingenuous to me.

Posted by: scot | Aug 8, 2009 12:52:36 PM

I agree that we need health care reform, and can understand your frustration with the system. I don't see Bingaman as a sell out, nor Obama. In a system as closed and corrupt as DC, fighting against the GOP machine and corporate health care has to happen in steps, in a pragmatic road to reform. So the change will happen more slowly than we would like, but it will happen. I'm optimistic it will, just over a longer period of time.

Posted by: Neen | Aug 8, 2009 1:35:13 PM

I haven't seen any genuine fighting against the corporate insurers except in the House. Obama has hung back and refused to draw any lines in the sand. We elected him to be a leader, not a compromiser.

Posted by: Ed | Aug 8, 2009 2:06:22 PM

The GOP machine? Democrats are finally in majority and they are the problem as well. Until we take money out of politics, we will never have a true party of and for working families.

Posted by: charlotte | Aug 8, 2009 2:07:31 PM

Honestly I am afraid how this health care reform is going we will end up with something far far worse than what we have now. I feel bad for the people that are not insured or are underinsured and I know it could happen to me toimorrow and most likely will. I can even think the damage has been done. Even if the representatives and sentators vote no now....the insurance corporations will jack up the prices and really fuck with what we have left. I have a real bad feeling about all of this, and i dont trust a single one of them I am sorry to say that but i think it may be a lost cause.
My position now is for Heinrich,Lujan, Teague, Udall, Bingamen to vote NO. What is being presented may harm the little insurance we the people have.

Posted by: mary ellen | Aug 8, 2009 2:27:33 PM

This is what Bingaman's "office" said last week: "We will be meeting with party orgs over break in raton, santa fe, deming and silver city for sure. It's pretty much standard procedure for us to do so in most counties. We haven't done bernalillo in a while. We're too late for august but we might have to catch the bernalillo folks in september."

Largest county in the state, nada. When was the last time we met with him? Remember he said, we need 60 votes. I guess that means we need 75, to take slack from the corporatist whores in the D party who might as well be Rs.

The birther/deathers are mad? Well, I am damn mad too. This is the worst crap yet.

Change I can't believe in. There is never any fucking change.

Posted by: bg | Aug 8, 2009 2:48:59 PM

With you 100%. Bingaman is definitely a sell-out and needs to be resoundingly defeated in the next election. He does not represent us. I have already called and written to Heinrich and told him to vote NO and I will continue to do so right up until the final moment. Better no bill than what is being crammed down our throats. If one of the House or Senate bills passes, it will take another 10 or 20 years before Congress will ever revisit this issue. The House plan doesn't even kick in until 2013. Then we will have to wait another 10 years to allow it time to settle in. At that rate, we'll never see real health care reform. I say, tell them to vote NO, and let's continue to educate the public and fight for Single Payer. It's the only true solution to the crisis. And when our representatives tell us that we can't have single payer because the "votes just aren't there", tell them that the votes that really won't be there are the ones for them, come the next election.

Posted by: Ronnie | Aug 8, 2009 3:32:36 PM

bg: So who is in these "county orgs"? Does that mean county chairs? Does it include ordinary Democrats in those places? I highly doubt it. He must be afraid to show his face to ordinary people after he spilled his cowardly guts to the Urinal.

Posted by: SNM | Aug 8, 2009 4:05:36 PM

I hope this is some kind of strategy to get a bill out of Baucus' committee and that the final Senate bill will be much better. It will be terrible if that is not the case. If it is the case Bingaman should have kept his views to himself. He comes across like a limp dishrag in that interview.

Posted by: Health Care Now | Aug 8, 2009 7:27:53 PM

You said: "...what every single other advanced Democracy already has: a health care system that is affordable and provides high quality care to everyone, rich or poor, sick or well."

Really? Which "advanced democracies" are those? Please name them. Because I don't know of a single democracy, advanced or otherwise, that provides affordable health care to all citizens -- let alone "quality" healthcare. In fact, quite the contrary. All of the democracies that offer universal healthcare are nearly broke. And none of them offers "quality" healthcare, merely mediocre healthcare.

Perhaps you've confused democracy with socialism? Although, gotta say, even the socialist states that offer universal healthcare don't do a very good job of it. And the ones that do are tiny countries, like Denmark. Do you think that type of healthcare can translate to a vastly larger population, like the U.S.? Boy, I don't.

If universal health care passes, be prepared to welcome mediocrity. Entities like the Cleveland Clinic will cease to exist because there's simply no incentive to be innovative under a socialist system that compensates mediocrity at the same rate as excellence.

Posted by: Noyb | Aug 8, 2009 7:56:04 PM

Good analysis. Weak senator. Healthcare is too important to offer a band aid to fix it. Vote "NO' to these bills. If something like this is passed we'll never see change again.

Posted by: peter | Aug 8, 2009 7:59:31 PM

Noyb: You can see for yourself in this ranking of health systems by nation released by the World Health Organization. France is #1, the US is #37.

http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html

Of course health care costs are rising everywhere due to new technologies and drugs, and an aging population. However, most of these nations pay significantly less per capita costs for better ranked care and universal care. That's because the either have no for-profit insurers or they keep rates in line with costs so humongous profits and whopper paychecks for CEO's aren't jacking up costs even more.

The U.S. also does poorly on life expectancy:

http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthy_life_table2.html

and on infant mortality:

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db09.htm

At the same time the US is spending more for care that's not as good, we leave at least 47 million uninsured and many more underinsured.

Posted by: barb | Aug 8, 2009 9:11:52 PM

One more point to consider. According to a chart that refers to American Family Physician, November 14, 2005, our median health care premium will EQUAL our median income by the year 2025!

EVERYTHING that we earn would be required to pay for health insurance! Can you see why single-payer is so urgent NOW? Please stand up and contact your congressman and senator NOW! We have not got one moment to lose!

Terry Riley

Posted by: Terry Riley | Aug 8, 2009 10:44:03 PM

If what you say in the last full paragraph is true, what difference is there in the outcome. You and the teabaggers have will have exactly the same outcome. The status quo. Disagree and let him know, but not in the same manner as the teabaggers.

I still think that it is time for the Democratic Party and it's elected officials to move a bit to the right. Having the extreme left guiding the party is very dangerous.

Posted by: Press | Aug 9, 2009 8:05:49 AM

The difference is we will continue to work for real health care reform, something that would be impossible if a bad bill is passed.

There is no left and right in health care reform, there is only effective and ineffective. Everyone agrees the goals are to provide universal coverage, hold down costs and improve quality of care in a variety of ways. The bill currently being discussed by Bingaman would not be effective on those counts because it is watered down too much and continues to give windfall profits to the industry with no real way to rein them in.

What is the "extreme left" you are talking about? Could you explain what you mean?

We are pushing for the very things mainstream Americans want and what a significant majority voted for in the 2009 election. I'm sure mainstream Americans do not want a reform bill that continues to enrich the pharmaceutical and insurance corporations while eliminating a strong public option and other ways to slow the rise of health care spending.

Posted by: barb | Aug 9, 2009 9:20:54 AM

It is simple. Senator Jeff Bingaman believes that his constituency is corporate. If he votes for coops and votes for health care reform that does not include a competitive public option, I will not vote for him even in the primary. We might as well have a Republican senator if the one we have is voting with the Republicans. Then we can work to elect a real Democratic person. We people of principle have to be ready to vote for the people's interests over predatory corporate interests. We need rulers that are working for sustainable long term solutions.
It would not be the first time that Senator Jeff Bingaman sided with predatory corporations. Recall the bankruptcy bill.

Perhaps it is time for a full review of Senator Jeff Bingaman's full voting record and honestly assess whether he is part of the solution or part of the problem.
I am paying the Senator's salary and I say that he IS accountable for his time. This lack of accountability and passion during a time when American history is being made should be a strong counterpoint when he comes up for election.

Watching Meet the Press hammer health care reform with absolutely no one to defend it. The panel is unbalanced skewed to the corporate short term interests.

Posted by: qofdisks | Aug 9, 2009 9:53:35 AM

Bingaman selling out New Mexicans is nothing new. He didn't become one of the wealthiest men in the Senate for nothing.

Re: facing "us" - don't count on it - he knows we are mad and you can expect he won't be showing up at Bernalillo County Dem Party's 3rd Thursday meeting.

We need to take the battle to him. Why not a protest outside his home in Silver City or at least his offices in Abq? Or a motion in Democratic Party condemning him for selling us out?

Posted by: mwfolsom | Aug 9, 2009 10:10:11 AM

This is silly: "I still think that it is time for the Democratic Party and it's elected officials to move a bit to the right. Having the extreme left guiding the party is very dangerous."

Whoever "Press" is has never really meet a hard lefty. Press has bought into the Repub idea that they are the center and we are the loonie left - folks here are pretty moderate.

Posted by: mwfolsom | Aug 9, 2009 10:13:46 AM

I was talking to a friend the other day who recently returned from the other side of the pond. At dinner one night, the dinner companions were said to be "quite "conservative." My friend is progressive and while being careful not to upset the "conservative" guests was amazed at their overall agreement about politics.

What is called "conservative" over there is "progressive" here. The rest of the "conservative" world is so much more progressive than what here is called "radical left."

Our "conservatives" are really more like the Taliban than anything.

Posted by: bg | Aug 9, 2009 11:37:16 AM

America today is too much like a backward nation in fear and standing still while the rest of the world moves on. Certain power blocs like it that way. Ironic that people most used by the system are out there screaming in defense of it.

Posted by: Frank T. | Aug 9, 2009 12:29:56 PM

"I still think that it is time for the Democratic Party and it's elected officials to move a bit to the right. "

The notion of a competitive public option IS already a big move to the right. Most of the country wants a single payer like people in Europe. The public option is already watering down the kind of reform that would give Americans true medical security and the most and best health care for our money.

The Democrats where supposed to be the practical party basing policy on evidence. The data says that countries that have single payer health care have superior health outcomes for less money. Statistics prove that private health insurance is inefficient and too costly.

Coops in our energy distribution system have been a disaster riddled with corruption. They provide flimsy consumer protection from arbitrary predation by the big energy corporations. The board members of these coops are complacent and paid off just like boards in private corporations.

Coops are an insult to the American people. Coops are what the Republicans want. Coops are a far right wing non-solution for health care. The Democratic compromise with the Republicans IS the public option.

Posted by: qofdisks | Aug 9, 2009 4:03:32 PM

I just got an email from Organizing for America, inviting me to stop in Bingaman's office this week to tell him what I think about health care reform.

So he will be available. Talk to him.

Posted by: Neen | Aug 9, 2009 8:45:33 PM

Neen-I don't believe Bingaman himself will be in his office. Is that what they said?

Posted by: Jan | Aug 10, 2009 7:44:25 AM

"Press has bought into the Repub idea that they are the center and we are the loonie left."

I have not bought into anything, anything, nada, much the Republican idea. And I beg to differ on the fact I have "not met a "hard lefty." I think I have and know several. I consider myself a liberal Democrat, but not a "hard lefty."

And in response an extreme left is probably a "hard leftie". Can't explain what extreme left is much better than that. Maybe like porn, I can't explain it but I know it when I see it. And the idea of the "Democratic Party condemning him for selling us out." is RIDICULOUS!
Anyway, interesting discussion here.

Posted by: Press | Aug 10, 2009 8:24:05 AM

Noyb, pull your head out.

Democracy is a political system. Socialism is an economic system.

Most of the countries in Europe are socialist democracies. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Posted by: Jason Call | Aug 10, 2009 10:41:27 AM